Ever seen a team celebrate record-high velocity while customers quietly vanish? This satirical fable will make you laugh, cringe, and maybe rethink what you measure next sprint. The Velocity Cult(A modern corporate fable about rewarding A while hoping for B) Let me tell you about Sophie. She joined bright-eyed, caffeinated, and carrying just enough imposter syndrome to fit right in. Day one, her manager pointed at the wall-sized Jira dashboard glowing with KPI green. Clear goal. No ambiguity. Sprint 1She closed a few tickets. It felt good. Sprint 2Sophie refined her craft. Her masterpiece:
Velocity spiked. Sprint 3Sophie published The Art of Story Hygiene. Someone asked about customer outcomes. Customers remained unchanged. Sprint 4She built a Slack bot that chimed “+5 Velocity!” when a ticket closed. The office printer jammed on certificates. Sprint 6A new engineer asked, “Shouldn’t we focus on outcomes?” Silence. Sophie smiled the way you smile at a toddler holding a knife. The bot chimed. Sprint 10Automation arrived. Velocity reached orbit. Sophie opened a ticket: “Add missing features (research) — 13 pts.” Sprint 52Velocity doubled, then tripled. Sophie was promoted to teach Velocity Discipline across the org. Then, one quiet afternoon, the product was sunset. EpilogueSophie kept a screenshot of the final dashboard. The company filed it under “Post-Mortem Exhibit A.” Months later, somewhere else, a manager pointed to a fresh dashboard and told a new hire: MoralIf your people don’t share the vision, they’ll follow the metric. As Steven Kerr warned in his classic, “On the Folly of Rewarding A While Hoping for B,” reward A while hoping for B, and you’ll get more A and less B. So stop rewarding points. FAQQ: Is “The Velocity Cult” based on a true story? Q: What’s the real lesson here? Q: How can we avoid becoming Sophie’s company? Explore further: |
How to create high-performing teams, innovative products and lead thriving businesses? The Agile Compass shares hands-on knowledge from 20+ years of experience in industries worldwide. Matthias is a Silicon Valley veteran and has been awarded the Agile Thought Leader award in 2022. His unique approach focuses on the human side of creating thriving organizations.
Last time I already mentioned a classic motivation study from the 1940s that should have changed how companies lead people. And despite the results, managers keep focusing on the wrong motivators. Let's look at this study in a little more detail. Here’s the mirror-image effect every leader should understand. The 75-Year-Old Motivation Study Every Leader Still Gets Wrong If you ever needed proof that managers and employees live in two different realities, here it is: the top motivators...
Most leaders today talk about motivation as if it were obvious: you set targets, attach rewards, maybe add pressure, and magically people perform. But the idea that humans do great work because they want to, not because they’re pushed or paid, is surprisingly new. And it didn’t come from management theory. It came from a series of weird psychological experiments that almost didn’t happen. The story of intrinsic motivation starts long before anyone had a name for it – and its lessons hit...
You know that feeling when a company throws another process or incentive program at a problem, and everyone quietly knows it won’t fix anything? That’s the Motivation Gap at work. Leaders keep betting on the wrong motivators, and employees wait for the things that actually matter – and then they quit. Here’s what’s really going on. The Motivation Gap – Why Leaders Double Down on the Wrong Things It’s almost impressive how consistently managers get motivation wrong. Ask them what drives...